U.S. severe renter cost burden by state and county
Cash-rent households spending at least 50% of income on gross rent, among households with a computable ratio.
United States · 2020–2024 · percent · percentage. U.S. Census Bureau, ACS five-year B25070.
- Who is counted
- Cash-rent households with a computable gross-rent-to-income ratio
- Definition
- Cash-rent households spending at least 50% of income on gross rent, among households with a computable ratio.
- Source publication date
- 2026-01-29
- Uncertainty
- Derived margin of error not calculated; original component MOEs retained
- Website calculation or variable
- 100 × (B25070_010E) / (B25070_001E − B25070_011E)
- Frozen website snapshot
- apd-2026-10-01-r3 · published October 1, 2026; sources acquired September 30, 2026
Source: U.S. Census Bureau · ACS five-year, B25070 · percentage. Derived percentage; margin of error not calculated.
Show accessible data table
| Area | Value (percent) | Numerator | Denominator | 90% MOE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 25.8948% | 10,852,194 | 41,908,786 | Not calculated |
| Texas | 25.2158% | 972,200 | 3,855,522 | Not calculated |
| California | 28.7540% | 1,631,395 | 5,673,625 | Not calculated |
| New York | 28.5336% | 949,399 | 3,327,305 | Not calculated |
| Florida | 31.3216% | 831,051 | 2,653,280 | Not calculated |
Severe renter cost burden: definition and scope
Cash-rent households spending at least 50% of income on gross rent, among households with a computable ratio. The headline is the latest value approved within this website’s frozen release. It is not a promise that no newer upstream product exists. The accessible table retains more precision than the rounded headline.
Limitations and comparability
The not-computed group is excluded. This denominator may differ from other published rent-burden measures.
The estimate describes the full 2020–2024 ACS period. Compare it with the same five-year product and universe. One-year ACS, model-based products and administrative counts cannot be joined into an unlabeled series.
Source count margins of error are retained in the raw download, but a margin of error for this calculated percentage is not supplied. We do not infer significance from point estimates, claim statistically settled ranks, or silently convert missing cells to zero. Cross-area associations do not establish individual circumstances or explain what caused a difference.
Source data, calculation and CSV downloads
Use the original selected cells, schema and formula with the immutable release. Summary-file columns use E001/M001; formulas use the corresponding ACS codes ending in E. Percentage numerators and denominators are supplied in the export.
100 × (B25070_010E) / (B25070_001E − B25070_011E)
Original producer file · National source cells · Original table dictionary · All covered areas for this indicator (CSV)
Severe renter cost burden by state
Same measure, source product and reference period. Alphabetical order; descriptive differences are not significance tests.
| Area | Exact value (percent) | Numerator / denominator | 90% MOE / status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 25.0942% | 130,168 / 518,718 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Alaska | 19.5042% | 15,829 / 81,157 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Arizona | 24.6901% | 214,791 / 869,948 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Arkansas | 21.4002% | 76,217 / 356,151 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| California | 28.7540% | 1,631,395 / 5,673,625 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Colorado | 25.7622% | 196,930 / 764,414 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Connecticut | 27.2513% | 123,019 / 451,425 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Delaware | 23.8368% | 24,315 / 102,006 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| District of Columbia | 23.6237% | 42,629 / 180,450 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Florida | 31.3216% | 831,051 / 2,653,280 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Georgia | 26.8582% | 346,433 / 1,289,858 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Hawaii | 28.5898% | 47,891 / 167,511 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Idaho | 20.5203% | 37,757 / 183,998 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Illinois | 24.6663% | 379,517 / 1,538,603 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Indiana | 24.0091% | 177,378 / 738,794 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Iowa | 21.8111% | 74,951 / 343,637 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Kansas | 20.5439% | 73,606 / 358,287 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Kentucky | 22.6606% | 115,959 / 511,721 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Louisiana | 30.0366% | 154,042 / 512,847 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Maine | 21.7740% | 30,422 / 139,717 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Maryland | 25.8842% | 187,232 / 723,345 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Massachusetts | 26.1189% | 257,582 / 986,190 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Michigan | 26.4296% | 265,994 / 1,006,424 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Minnesota | 23.5518% | 142,269 / 604,069 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Mississippi | 25.9918% | 76,061 / 292,635 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Missouri | 22.2121% | 163,865 / 737,729 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Montana | 20.7688% | 26,527 / 127,725 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Nebraska | 21.4401% | 53,256 / 248,394 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Nevada | 28.2731% | 128,589 / 454,811 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| New Hampshire | 22.1811% | 31,784 / 143,293 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| New Jersey | 26.8446% | 324,015 / 1,207,003 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| New Mexico | 26.1997% | 59,008 / 225,224 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| New York | 28.5336% | 949,399 / 3,327,305 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| North Carolina | 23.5835% | 308,231 / 1,306,980 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| North Dakota | 18.3007% | 21,024 / 114,881 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Ohio | 23.2562% | 342,982 / 1,474,800 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Oklahoma | 22.6337% | 108,874 / 481,026 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Oregon | 26.7770% | 159,286 / 594,861 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Pennsylvania | 24.8804% | 372,351 / 1,496,561 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Rhode Island | 23.7918% | 36,151 / 151,947 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| South Carolina | 26.2775% | 139,228 / 529,838 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| South Dakota | 17.6929% | 18,611 / 105,189 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Tennessee | 23.3388% | 197,884 / 847,874 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Texas | 25.2158% | 972,200 / 3,855,522 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Utah | 21.1373% | 67,056 / 317,240 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Vermont | 24.2187% | 16,591 / 68,505 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Virginia | 24.0634% | 246,839 / 1,025,785 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Washington | 23.5462% | 248,406 / 1,054,973 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| West Virginia | 24.5387% | 37,146 / 151,377 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Wisconsin | 20.9364% | 156,871 / 749,274 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |
| Wyoming | 20.3398% | 12,582 / 61,859 | Derived MOE not calculated · available |